Although controversy arises from time to time among experts and administrators, the fact remains that many police agencies in this country need a patrol rifle more powerful than the 5.56mm in AR 10 charging handle. It is often difficult for people working in urban areas to understand, but in many rural areas, officers are under firearms or are simply armed with 5.56mm weapons. In this country, especially in the west, there are places where the .30-06 is considered an intermediate patron and there may be a couple in the family. To learn more updates about this.

Quite a few people conducted their first hunt with a .30-06 or .308 bolt action rifle. For many, this is “just a hunting rifle,” which is true, but bullets fired once don't care where they come from. A. 30-06 in your direction - it doesn't matter if it was launched by an M1 Garand or a Model 700.

When you drive up to the ranch entrance and start receiving fire from 300 yards away, this distinction is lost in semantics. Returning fire with your 5.56mm AR 10 charging handle at this point can be a little problematic. How easy it is to shoot on paper, how effectively it can be lost for an officer who has 30-caliber shells passing through his car.

At this stage, the term "mouse pistol" has a real meaning for an officer seeking cover. Of course, the tactical advantage is to return fire with the same or greater caliber, For many agencies, the solution to this problem has been government programs that provide surplus M14 rifles.

This used to be an option for many agencies in my home state of Utah. This program is drying up a bit, however, and many agencies simply want more modern firearms or weapons that officers are used to. The most obvious solution is the 7.62x51mm rifle on the ubiquitous AR platform. Sounds simple, since in 1956 Eugene Stoner actually introduced the original design of this caliber. Many of these initial innovations were to come with the AR10 charging handle rifle. As simple as it sounds in practice, providing a reliable rifle on this platform proved to be much more problematic.

When it reappeared on the market as the AR10 charging handle in the early 1990s, the rifle was initially very popular. Having had a few and experienced even more, the design, with all its pros and cons, is quite familiar. Initially, they seemed pretty good. Some were flawless and accurate, while others were imperfect and more useful as a hammer. Most were reliable as long as the correct ammo was used and the magazine worked well. The design was not suitable for either polymer tipped bullets or flat nose bullets. The all-day barrier was pretty flat and often just didn't fixate on this gun.

The platform has seen its ups and downs, and several other companies have created similar versions. Knight SR25 is and has been fielded by our military for many years. While the valuable rifle is certainly a good one, it puts them well beyond most agencies and mere mortals, especially ordinary mortals with a badge.

Each manufacturer has something different in their rifle and they are all advertised as 100% reliable. After years of testing and firing firearms of every type, type, value, and caliber, the term is a bit misleading. Quoting Clint Smith years ago: "If they can spend billions of dollars on a space shuttle and it fails, your $ 2,500 rifle could fail as well!" In any case, testing shows that most of them are pretty reliable today, and many of them have solved the main problems with this platform.